Naqshbandiya Foundation for Islamic Education

The Naqshbandiya Foundation for Islamic Education (NFIE) is a non-profit, tax exempt, religious and educational organization dedicated to serve Islam with a special focus on Tasawwuf(Sufism),

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

What Tasawwuf(Sufism) Really Is: The 10 Traits of Its People | Shaykh Yahya Rhodus-Reza-Sep 12, 2026

 YouTube Video:

https://youtu.be/pQQx6TYh2lg?si=KgmfObQ-_7I5mv37

Shaykh Yahya Rhodus teaches Sufism: Its Essence and the Traits of Its People by al-Habib ʿUmar bin Hafiz — a full seminar on what tasawwuf actually is, and the ten traits that mark the people who live it. The book defines tasawwuf as acting with excellence (ihsan) on what Allah says in His Book and on the tongue of His Messenger ﷺ, and embodying those qualities experientially — not merely believing them, but rising through the degrees of certainty until they become lived reality. A believer knows Allah is the Provider; the one who has realised it doesn't panic when the job goes. Shaykh Yahya works through all ten traits, then takes questions from the audience. 
What is covered: Setting the ground: Why the word tasawwuf carries weight, and the difference between being a Muslim, a mu'min, and a muhsin. Four definitions of tasawwuf from the book. The degrees of certainty, and why belief and realisation are not the same thing — a believer knows Allah is the Provider; the one who has realised it doesn't panic when the job goes. Who is actually called a Sufi, and the three ranks: the one who has arrived, the one still travelling, and the one who believes in the path and loves its people. Along the way, why the Qur'an was revealed at all, what religious maturity looks like in practice — knowing which question to ask whom — and a personal reflection on his mother's passing and the gap between what Islam is and what people assume it is. 
The ten traits: Knowledge of the Book and the Sunnah:
the foundation; nothing is built without it. Includes a practical goal for daily Qur'an recitation, and why knowledge without action is meaningless. 
Concern for the attributes and actions of the heart:
The heart is what is weighed, and why its actions can outweigh years of outward worship. What it means to adorn the heart, and what disfigures it. 
Sincerity (ikhlas): 
Purifying intention of every trace of others, the way honey is drawn out of the comb. 
Truthfulness (sidq:)
Giving the whole of yourself to whatever is in front of you, and its six ascending levels. 
Humility of heart:
Not holding yourself above anyone, and what humility is not. 
Recognising the people of honour and uprooting envy: 
Why envy destroys families and communities, and the practice that removes it. 
Remembering Allah abundantly:Presence and perseverance as the two pillars of dhikr. 
Conveying with excellence and leaving discourteous argument: 
Why online quarrels are not how anyone builds their religion. 
Responding to evil with goodness: including what it costs to insist on your rights, and why letting go takes time and sometimes help. 
Love of Allah and preferring Him over all else: the station everything else leads to. 
Audience questions: Making duʿa for the guidance of non-Muslims. Caring for a parent in cognitive decline without breaking yourself. The difference between working on the ego and hating yourself. Why knowledge doesn't always become action. Familiarity with scholars and forgetting their rank. Advice for the munshid. How to respond when people hostile to Islam suffer setbacks. Dhikr of the tongue versus dhikr of the heart. Advice for those who struggle with Arabic pronunciation. 
About the teacher: Shaykh Yahya Rhodus Founding Director of Al-Maqasid seminary in Pennsylvania. He studied with Murabit al-Hajj in Mauritania and at Dar al-Mustafa in Tarim under Habib ʿUmar bin Hafiz. https://www.almaqasid.org/seminary-in... 
About the author: al-Habib ʿUmar bin Hafiz: Founder of Dar al-Mustafa in Tarim, Hadramawt, and one of the leading scholars of the Baʿalawi tradition. https://muwasala.org/2012/06/05/habib... Original recording credit and thanks to MCC East Bay (Muslim Community Center)


Sufism (Tasawwuf), the path of spiritual purification, is the essence of Islam. Ironically, misunderstandings regarding it remain prevalent. This book's Author,Habib Umar bin Hafiz is a living Master of both the inward and outward sciences of Islam. With clarity and authority, he succinctly provides a definitive understanding of Sufism and the ten most important traits of its true people. 
Any claims that contradict these qualities have no authentic connection to Sufism. May Allah magnify its benefit for the author, reader, scribe, listener, and the entire Ummah of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him). 
Contents: 
First Trait: Knowledge of the Book & the Sunna 
Second Trait: Their Concern with the Attributes and Actions of the Heart 
Third Trait: Sincerity 
Fourth Trait: Trueness 
Fifth Trait: Humility of Heart 
Sixth Trait: Recognizing the People of Honor & Eliminating Envy 
Seventh Trait: Remembering Allah Abundantly 
Eighth Trait: Conveying with Excellence & Eliminating Discourteous Argumentation 
Ninth Trait: Responding to Evil with Goodness 
Tenth Trait: Love of Allah & Preferring Him Over All Else

Question: The term Sufism (misnomer) was introduced by which Orientalist and when?

Answar:Source:Google AI:
The term Sufism (originally appearing as Sufiism) was coined in English around 1817 by Western scholars and Orientalists associated with the Asiatic Society and colonial administration in India, rather than being attributed to a single individual. [1, 2, 3]

Origins and ContextTimeframe: The neologism emerged in the late 18th to early 19th century (recorded in English as Sufiism in 1817 and later refined to Sufism by 1836). [1]

Early Figures: Pioneer British Orientalists like Sir William Jones (1746–1794) and later German scholars like F.A. D. Tholuck (who wrote Ssufismus in 1821) helped popularize the academic study of the tradition. [1, 2]
Concept vs. Tradition: While practitioners historically used the Arabic term taṣawwuf to describe their spiritual path, European Orientalists applied the -ism suffix to categorize it as an intellectual doctrine or standalone "mysticism" separate from mainstream Islamic practice. [1, 2, 3]

Taṣawwuf vs. Sufism: The Concept and the Category:

The divergence between the indigenous term and the Western neologism reflects two very different ways of understanding Islamic spirituality. [1]Taṣawwuf: This is an Arabic verbal noun that literally translates to "the process of becoming a Sufi" or "dressing in wool" (ṣūf). Within Islamic civilization, it is considered an internal, organic dimension of the Islamic faith. It is treated not as an isolated ideology, but as the practical realization of Ihsān (spiritual excellence or doing what is beautiful), operating side-by-side with Imān (faith) and Islām (ritual practice). [1, 2]
"Sufism": By attaching the Enlightenment-era "-ism" suffix, European academics artificially isolated these spiritual practices into a distinct, bounded "system" or philosophy. This shift reframed a living, multi-layered spiritual method into an abstract intellectual doctrine that could be studied independently of the daily religious life of Muslims. [1, 2, 3]

How Early Orientalist Views Shaped Modern Study
The early Western academic approach to taṣawwuf was heavily shaped by the colonial and cultural biases of the 18th and 19th centuries: [1]The Thesis of "Foreign Origin": Because many early Orientalists held deeply negative stereotypes about mainstream Islam—viewing it as inherently legalistic, stagnant, or "sterile"—they found it difficult to believe that profound mystical poetry and philosophy could blossom from within the faith. As a result, scholars like Sir William Jones argued that Sufism must have emerged from outside influences, such as Hindu Vedanta, Buddhist meditation, Christian monasticism, or ancient Greek Neo-Platonism. [1, 2, 3]

The Divide-and-Conquer Categorization: This scholarship created a sharp, manufactured dichotomy between the "good, tolerant, poetic Sufi" and the "bad, rigid orthodox Muslim". While colonial administrations eagerly cataloged and translated the humanistic poetry of Hafez or Rumi, they simultaneously viewed the actual, living Sufi political networks and brotherhoods (tariqas) with suspicion, seeing them as centers for potential anti-colonial resistance. [1, 2]

Impact on the Modern Field: For generations, Western academia inherited this flawed framework, often analyzing Sufi texts completely divorced from Islamic law (sharia) and theology. It was only in the mid-to-late 20th century that modern historians and scholars—such as Carl Ernst and Nile Green—successfully dismantled these older theories, definitively proving that historical Sufism and orthodox Islam were inextricably intertwined and mutually reinforcing. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Taṣawwuf vs. Sufism: The Concept and the Category

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home